We Call Her Winnie

For years we have talked about the WI-38 cell line as if it rolled off an assembly line, and it is not part of an innocent little girl who was murdered. Referring to people by numbers is dehumanizing.

In our conversations about this child, her lungs, her cells, her DNA and her blood proteins, we felt more and more empty as we continued to refer to her, and what was stolen from her, by a number assigned to her by Leonard Hayflick, who contracted with Sven Guard for her murder to obtain her lungs in Sweden in 1962 .

So we named her Winnie.

Winifred Isaksson could be the name of an elegant Swedish woman in her late 50s, and it is the formal name that we have given to her so that she may be referred to with the dignity that is due every child of God. Here we have given her a portrait to symbolize who she might be had she been left alone to grow into a school girl in Sweden.

Participation in the abortion industry, and the purchase and injection Winnie’s cellular remains, including her blood proteins and DNA, are now legal requirements to receive a public or Christian school education in five states.

We have also taken to calling the British boy that was killed for his cells, marketed under the product name MRC-5, Michael Richard Christian.

Mikey was a child who was fearfully and wonderfully made, and whose life gave God joy. We honor him and those who suffered his fate.

We believe that all of the children killed for organ harvesting deserve names and a humanizing face, as do all children, so we have given them both here. We have not yet done so for any of the other children killed for vaccine research purposes, but hope that they will be honored in kind as the Church comes to understand that lives were stolen from these precious ones in the name of “science” and “health.”

Update:

Lanie Danae contacted us about another cell line child. “Little Dani is the name I gave the baby girl WALVAX-2 was derived from. It means “God will judge.”

Danielle Wong now has a name.

11 thoughts on “We Call Her Winnie”

  1. Ginger Taylor is emerging as a spiritual witness to the dark underbelly of the vax$ine program. Thanks to Ginger, those who have eyes to see, ears to hear, and hearts to feel recognize the truth: the Greater Good ethos used to justify human sacrifice and cannibalism is just another form of evil.

  2. I’ve often wondered who the children would have become had they been given the chance to live. What their children and grandchildren would have become. It saddens me that event the Christian community accepts vaccinations that have been created through the deaths of other children. We need to change this.

  3. Ginger, there were 9 babies aborted and they chose the best cell line of them all for WALVAX-2. We should name the other 8 babies, too, even though their cells are not being sold. I love what you’re doing, even though it makes me cry.

    1. They all deserve names. The 27 killed before they were satisfied with Winnie’s lungs. The 70 plus Plotkin used for a single research project. The thousands used since this began in the 1930s. They were all a joy to God.

      1. Do you have a Facebook page? I couldn’t find it. This is a touching and heartbreaking post that the Body of Messiah will hopefully learn about soon, by God’s mercy. May He allow these awful hidden things to come into the light and be stopped.

    2. There were more than these aborted. My understanding is that they experimented first on over 70 before using the final babies in the vaccines put on the market.

  4. Oh wow, To give these little children names and a picture really is a powerful wake up call, with tears, to fully realize the wickedness of using aborted baby cell lines in vaccine production.

    I’m not an artist but I’ve thought of a collage-type picture (perhaps somewhat misty) of adult faces or children’s faces and a comment about what if they’d never been aborted? Or it could be used for the vaccine theme as well.

    Christians! Where are you in this great evil? How can we be against abortion but accept vaccines using aborted baby cell lines? The reasoning I hear, even from the Catholic Church, is this happened long ago and now it okay and it works out for the “greater good.” Does “time” (long ago) erase a sin? That presents a theological dilemma.

    So glad to have found this blog. Thank you and may God bless us with wisdom and courage to do what is right in His eyes.

  5. No one, no institution, has the right to use another’s body for a profitable enterprise. The right to own one’s own body, the right to protect our children’s bodies…is sacred. To violate this is to commit the most heinous of crimes and the most despicable of sins.
    I might add to this, that the pharmaceutical industry, daily, tortures and murders thousands of innocent animals, sentient beings who have souls, and can suffer…..and do suffer….terribly….at the behest of the malignant, criminal pharmaceutical and medical industries. The drugs and procedures these industries advocate are toxic and very harmful. Treating patients with the gentle effective Hippocratic way of “Do no harm, let food be your medicine” is the way to prevent, and heal disease.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *